Ancient coptic manuscript dating from south african sex rooms and sex sites
The New Testament is constantly under attack, and its reliability and accuracy are often contested by critics.
If the critics want to disregard the New Testament, then they must also disregard other ancient writings by Plato, Aristotle, and Homer. As you can see, there are thousands more New Testament Greek manuscripts than any other ancient writing.
Undoubtedly, that period of time allows for more textual corruption in its transmission. If the critics of the Bible dismiss the New Testament as reliable information, then they must also dismiss the reliability of the writings of Plato, Aristotle, Caesar, Homer, and the other authors mentioned in the chart at the beginning of the paper.
On the other hand, if the critics acknowledge the historicity and writings of those other individuals, then they must also retain the historicity and writings of the New Testament authors; after all, the evidence for the New Testament's reliability is far greater than the others.
But, we have absolutely no ancient documents contemporary with the First Century that contest the New Testament texts. This is extremely close to the original writing date.
Furthermore, another important aspect of this discussion is the fact that we have a fragment of the gospel of John that dates back to around 29 years from the original writing (John Rylands Papyri A. This is simply unheard of in any other ancient writing, and it demonstrates that the Gospel of John is a First Century document.
Jull chose the samples to be radiocarbon dated after discussions with Rodolphe Kasser, a Swiss who is regarded as one of the world's preeminent Coptic scholars.
The codex languished in a safe-deposit box on Long Island, N. An NGC video crew shot footage of UA radiocarbon dating for the documentery last October.